Not a report builder with forty options. Four documents a QS produces every month, each already laid out the way a client expects to receive it.
A cost report exists so the client hears about an overrun while something can still be done about it. Delivered at final account it is not a report, it is an invoice they never agreed to.
Anticipated final cost sits against the approved budget from the first valuation onwards, with the contingency drawn from your risk register rather than guessed.
Two documents that exist to stop an argument before it starts. The retention notice tells the client exactly what is held and when it comes back. The payment schedule shows every certificate, what was due and what was received.
Reports get photocopied, scanned and attached to adjudication papers. Anything that relies on colour stops being readable at that point, and a report that cannot be read is a report that cannot be relied on.
Every document QScope prints is black and white, with negative amounts in brackets and figures set in tabular numerals so columns line up.
The layout is fixed, and deliberately so. These are documents that go into client files and adjudication bundles, and a consistent format is worth more than a configurable one. What changes is your logo, your practice name and your client reference.
Because certificates and reports get photocopied and scanned. A figure that is only red stops being a warning once it is grey. Negative amounts appear in brackets instead, which is the accounting convention and survives any amount of copying.
Not unless you print it for them deliberately. It is hidden from guest links by default, because a client who can read your contingency will always want to negotiate it.
Yes. The audit trail exports to CSV, and project data can be exported at any time, including during a trial and for 60 days after a cancellation.
Not your whole portfolio. One live job, one certificate. If it does not save you time the first time you use it, walk away and take your data with you.